ARBITRATION
Outline:-
1.
Arbitration in industrial disputes.
2.
International Arbitration. (a) The
Alabama Case (b) The Hague Tribunal (c) The League of Nations (d) The U.N.O.
If two persons indulge in a dispute
and cannot come to any agreement, they may ask some impartial third person to
settle the question, both promising to abide by his decision. This is what is
meant by “arbitration”. Arbitration has often been tried, and with a good deal
of success, as a method of settling disputes in the industrial world between
employers and their workmen. Many disastrous strikes have been averted in this
way, though strikes still occur. There is hope, however, that gradually
arbitration will win its way, and strikes and lockouts become things of the
past.
War is such a horrible way of
settling disputes between nations that long ago arbitration was tried instead;
and not without success. The first great case settled by international
arbitration was what we called the Alabama case. This was a dispute between
England and the United States about a privateer, called the Alabama, which
almost brought the two countries into war with each other. Both countries,
however, agreed to refer the case to an international tribunal which met at
Geneva in 1872. Both countries loyally accepted the decision of the tribunal,
which went against England; and war was averted. Since then many arbitration
treaties have been made between different countries, and many disputes settled
in this way. But still wars have continued.
The Hague Conference in 1899, which
was called at the suggestion of the Tzar of Russia, was an important step
towards international arbitration. It appointed a permanent Arbitration Court
called the Hague Tribunal. But it had two defects. One was that reference of
disputes to the court was to be voluntary; the other was the Tribunal’s lack of
any power to enforce its decisions. Anyway, this scheme did not abolish war;
for only fifteen years after it was established, the most awful war in history
broke out.
The next step was the establishment
of the Great War-I of the 1914 of the League of Nations. There were great hopes
that it would make an end of war; and it did certainly prevent some minor
conflicts. But it had the same weakness that stultified the Hague Tribunal,
lack of authority and force. Now the League, weakened by the defection of
several great powers, is practically dead. But something like it is undoubtedly
needed to save Europe from another world war, which might completely wreck
modern civilization. War has become such a menace that the nations will have to
find some way of abolishing it forever. The League of Nations became null and
void due to its weakness. Its place was later taken by the UNO after the Second
World War of 1939.
No comments:
Post a Comment